Jane S. Orcutt v. City of Los Angeles

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 9, 20242:24-cv-04701California4,968 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JANE S. ORCUTT,

Case No. 2:24-cv-04701-RGK-SSC

Plaintiff(s), [PROPOSED] STIPULATED

PROTECTIVE ORDER1

v.

CITY OF LOS ANGELES;

MICHAEL C. TARANGO,

individually and in his capacity as an officer of the CITY OF LOS 18 ANGELES Police Department; LUKE A. EDNEY, individually and in his capacity as an officer of the CITY OF 20 LOS ANGELES Police Department; ROM KENMORE LLC; R.O.M. INVESTMENTS, INC. and DOES 1 22 to 10, 23 Defendant(s).

25

1 This Stipulated Protective Order is substantially based on the model protective 1. INTRODUCTION 1. Purposes and Limitations. Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the court to enter the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.