Danele Morgan v. William Watson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 DANELE MORGAN, Case No. 2:23-cv-01473-SSS-AJR

Petitioner,

ORDER ACCEPTING

FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS v. AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES

WILLIAM WATSON, M.D., MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Defendant.

18 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Second Amended Complaint [Dkt. 31], all the records and files herein, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge [Dkt. 41], Plaintiff’s Objections to the Report and Recommendation [Dkt. 48], and Defendant’s Response to Plaintiff’s Objections [Dkt. 49]. The Court conducted a de novo review of those portions to which Plaintiff has objected. However, Plaintiff’s Objections do not cause the Court to disagree with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff objects that he has stated an Eighth Amendment claim under Bivens v. Six…