Andrian Sianez Sanchez v. Irwindale Brew Yard, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 7, 20242:24-cv-02602California1,593 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

JS-6 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ADRIAN SIANEZ SANCHEZ, Case No. 2:24-cv-02602-FLA (PVCx)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION TO REMAND [DKT. 10]

IRWINDALE BREW YARD, LLC, et al., 15 Defendants.

18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RULING Before the court is Plaintiff Adrian Sianez Sanchez’s (“Plaintiff”) motion to remand for lack of subject matter jurisdiction (“Motion”). Dkt. 10 (“Mot.”). Defendants Irwindale Brew Yard, LLC, IBY, LLC, PABST Brewing Company, LLC, and City Brewing Company, LLC (collectively, “Defendants”) oppose the Motion. Dkt. 12 (“Opp’n”). On May 22, 2024, the court found the Motion appropriate for resolution without oral argument and vacated the hearing set for May 24, 2024. Dkt. 14. For the reasons stated herein, the court GRANTS the Motion and REMANDS this action to the Los Angeles County Superior Court. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.