Juan Valencia v. Rosalina Contreras

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 15, 20242:24-cv-08350California943 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 Case No.: 2:24-cv-08350-MEMF-RAO JUAN VALENCIA,

Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE

COURT SHOULD NOT DECLINE TO

v. EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL

JURISDICTION OV ER PLAINTIFF’S

STATE LAW CLAIMS

ROSALINA CONTRERAS D/B/A

SANDOVALS LAWNMOWERS; ERNEST S.

GOULD, AS TRUSTEE OF THE ERNEST S.

GOULD TRUST; AND DOES 1 TO 10,

17 Defendants.

20 On September 27, 2024, Plaintiff Juan Valencia fil ed a Complaint against Defendants 21 Rosalina Contreras D/B/A Sandovals Lawnmowers; Ernest S. Gould, as Trustee of the Ernest S. 22 Gould Trust; and Does 1 to 10, asserting: (1) a claim for injunctive relief arising out of an alleged 23 violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12010–12213; (2) a claim 24 for damages pursuant to California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act (“Unruh Act”), Cal. Civ. Code §§ 51– 25 52, et seq.; (3) a claim for damages pursuant to the California Disabled Persons Act, Cal. Civ. Code 26 § 54, et…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.