Joy Johnson v. Navient Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 15, 20242:24-cv-03164California5,268 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

O

2 3 4 5 6

United States District Court Central District of California

11 JOY JOHNSON et al., Case № 2:24-cv-03164-ODW (SKx)

Plaintiffs,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’

v.

MOTION TO REMAND AND

14 NAVIENT CORPORATION et al., GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS [12] [21] Defendants.

16 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs Joy Johnson and Micah Brown bring this action against Defendants 19 Navient Corporation and Navient Solutions, LLC (collectively “Navient”) for 20 allegedly breaching a student loan contract. (First Am. Compl. (“FAC”), ECF 21 No. 19.) Plaintiffs moved to remand and then filed their FAC. (Mot. Remand, ECF 22 No. 12; FAC.) Defendants now move to dismiss Plaintiffs’ first, second, fifth, sixth, 23 and seventh causes of action for failure to state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil 24 Procedure (“Rule”) 12(b)(6). (Mot. Dismiss, ECF No. 21.) For the reasons discussed 25 below, the Court DENIES Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand and GRANTS Defendants’ 26 Motion to Dismiss WITH LEAVE TO…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.