Mario Mendoza v. Graciela Ramirez Ruiz

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 18, 20242:24-cv-08877California437 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case No. 2:24-cv-08877-RGK-SSC Date October 18, 2024 Title Mendoza v. Graciela Ramirez Ruiz d/b/a La Mexicana Bakery et al. Present: The R. GARY KLAUSNER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Honorable Joseph Remigio Not Reported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendants: None None Proceedings: IN CHAMBERS — ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE The Complaint filed in this action asserts a claim for injunctive relief arising out of an alleged violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12010-12213, and a claim for damages pursuant to California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act (“Unruh Act”), Cal. Civ. Code §§ 51-53. It appears that the Court possesses only supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act claim, and any other state law claim that plaintiff may have alleged, pursuant to the Court’s supplemental jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 1367(a). The supplemental jurisdiction statute “reflects the understanding that, when deciding whether to exercise supplemental…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.