Moises Villalobos v. The Target Range

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 21, 20242:24-cv-07328California2,982 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

1 O

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case No.: 2:24-cv-07328-MEMF-PVC

MOISES VILLALOBOS,

12 Plaintiff, ORDER DECLINING TO EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION OVER v. PLAINTIFF’S STATE LAW CLAIMS

THE TARGET RANGE; NEHEN

INDUSTRIAL LLC; and DOES 1 to 10, Defendants. 18 Before the Court is the Response to the Court’s Order to Show Cause Regarding Supplemental Jurisdiction filed by Plaintiff Moises Villalobos (“Villalobos”). ECF No. 15. For the reasons stated herein, the Court DECLINES to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Villalobos’s state law claims and DISMISSES the claims. I. Background A. Factual Background1 Villalobos suffers from paraplegia and requires a wheelchair while traveling in public. Compl. ¶ 1. Defendants The Target Range and Nehen Industrial LLC (“Defendants”) are, or were at 27 1 The factual allegations included in this section are taken from the Complaint. ECF No. 1 (“Compl.”). The the time of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.