Eric Cameron Lane v. United States

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 21, 20245:24-cv-02192California745 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL

Case No. EDCV 24-2192-KK-SPx Date: October 21, 2024 Title:

Present: The Honorable KENLY KIYA KATO, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Noe Ponce Not Reported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter

Attorney(s) Present for Plaintiff(s): Attorney(s) Present for Defendant(s): None Present None Present

Proceedings: (In Chambers) Order to Show Cause Why Action Should Not Be Dismissed

On October 15, 2024, plaintiff Eric Lane (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, filed the instant Complaint. ECF Docket No. (“Dkt.”) 1, Compl. Plaintiff brings his claim under the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”) alleging his U.S. Department of Veteran Affairs Vocational Rehabilitation & Employment (“VR&E”) counselor “negligently failed to perform her duties in administering benefits for which [Plaintiff] was approved.” Compl. ¶ 6.

Federal courts are courts of “limited jurisdiction” which “possess only that power authorized by Constitution and statute[.]” Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375, 377 (1994). Thus, federal courts…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.