Manika Millis v. Science Applications International Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 22, 20242:24-cv-07688California1,336 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

JS-

5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MANIKA MILLIS, ) Case No. CV 24-7688 FMO (MAAx) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ORDER REMANDING ACTION ) SCIENCE APPLICATIONS ) INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, et ) al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) 18 On August 30, 2024, Manika Millis (“plaintiff”) filed a Complaint in the Los Angeles County Superior Court against Science Applications International Corporation (“SAIC”) as well as Alex Wiercigroch, Quinn Monsen, Brent Reimer, Julie Bellagamba, Weislaw Kwiecien, Phong Pham, Lauren Smith, Jaye Parker, Jamie Hicks, and Erica Williams (“individual defendants”) (collectively, “defendants”), asserting state law claims relating to her employment. (See Dkt. 1, Notice of Removal (“NOR”) at ¶ 1); (Dkt. 1-1, Exh. A, Complaint at ¶¶ 3-15). On September 9, 2024, SAIC removed the action on diversity jurisdiction grounds pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1332 and 1441. (See Dkt. 1,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.