Virginia Alvarado v. Richman Property Services, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 22, 20248:24-cv-02008California4,050 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

O

JS-

2 3 4 5 6

United States District Court Central District of California

11 VIRGINIA ALVARADO et al., Case № 8:24-cv-02008-ODW (SSCx)

Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’

v. MOTION TO REMAND [19]; AND

DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION

14 RICHMAN PROPERTY SERVICES, TO DISMISS [10] INC. et al.,

Defendants.

17 I. INTRODUCTION On August 12, 2024, Plaintiffs Virginia Alvarado and Eduardo Alvarado 20 initiated this action against Defendants Richman Property Services, Inc. (“Richman”) 21 and DOES through for violation of California’s Investigative Consumer 22 Reporting Agencies Act (“ICRAA”) in the Superior Court of California. (Notice 23 Removal (“NOR”) Ex. A (“Complaint” or “Compl.”), ECF Nos. 1, 1-1.) On 24 September 18, 2024, Richman removed this action to federal court based on alleged 25 diversity jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a). (NOR ¶ 11.) Plaintiffs now 26 move to remand. (Mem. P. & A. ISO Mot. Remand (“Motion” or “Mot.”), ECF 27 28 1 No. 19-1.) …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.