Valanda Harville v. Richman Property Services, Inc.

O

JS-

2 3 4 5 6

United States District Court Central District of California

11 VALANDA HARVILLE et al., Case № 2:24-cv-07832-ODW (SSCx)

Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’

v. MOTION TO REMAND [25]; AND

DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION

14 RICHMAN PROPERTY SERVICES, TO DISMISS [11] INC. et al.,

Defendants.

17 I. INTRODUCTION On August 8, 2024, Plaintiffs Valanda Harville and Kimberly Lee initiated this 20 action against Defendants Richman Property Services, Inc. (“Richman”) and DOES 1 21 through 10 for violation of California’s Investigative Consumer Reporting Agencies 22 Act (“ICRAA”) in the Superior Court of California. (Notice Removal (“NOR”) Ex. A 23 (“Complaint” or “Compl.”), ECF Nos. 1, 1-1.) On September 13, 2024, Richman 24 removed this action to federal court based on alleged diversity jurisdiction pursuant to 25 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a). (NOR ¶ 11.) Plaintiffs now move to remand. (Mem. P. & A. 26 ISO Mot. Remand (“Motion” or “Mot.”), ECF No. 25-1.) For the reasons below, the 27 28 1 Court GRANTS …