James Toledano v. Priscilla Marconi

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 28, 20248:22-cv-01331California449 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES TOLEDANO, Case No. SACV 22-1331-MWF (BFM)

Plaintiff

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT

v. AND RECOMMENDATION OF

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

PRISCILLA MARCONI, et al., JUDGE Defendants.

16 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”, Docket No. 82), Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss the SAC (“Motions,” Docket Nos. 83, 85), the Request for Judicial Notice (Docket No. 84), Plaintiff’s Oppositions to the Motions (Docket Nos. 88, 89), the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge recommending granting the Request for Judicial Notice and Motions in part (“Report,” Docket No. 92), Plaintiff’s Objections to the Report (“Objections,” Docket No. 94), Defendants’ Responses to the Objections (Docket Nos. 95, 96), and other relevant records on file. Despite the de novo review, the Court accepts and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s detailed and thorough Report. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.