Rashon Murph v. Richman Property Services, Inc.

O

JS-

2 3 4 5 6

United States District Court Central District of California

11 RASHON MURPH et al., Case № 2:24-cv-08545-ODW (SSCx)

Plaintiffs, ORDER REMANDING CASE AND

v. DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION

TO DISMISS [10]

14 RICHMAN PROPERTY SERVICES, INC. et al.,

Defendants.

17 I. INTRODUCTION On August 14, 2024, Plaintiffs Rashon Murph and Nicole Murph initiated this 20 action against Defendants Richman Property Services, Inc. (“Richman”) and DOES 1 21 through 10 for violation of California’s Investigative Consumer Reporting Agencies 22 Act (“ICRAA”) in the Superior Court of California. (Notice Removal (“NOR”) Ex. A 23 (“Complaint” or “Compl.”), ECF Nos. 1, 1-1.) On October 4, 2024, Richman 24 removed this action to federal court based on alleged diversity jurisdiction pursuant to 25 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a). (NOR ¶ 11.) On October 21, 2024, the Court ordered the parties 26 to show cause why this action should not be remanded for lack of subject-matter 27 jurisdiction. (Order Show Cause (“OSC”), ECF No…