Legendz Entertainment LLC v. Cam Specialty Lending 1 LTD

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 25, 20242:23-cv-03097California2,228 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

O

2 3 4 5 6 7 United States District Court Central District of California 10 11 LEGENDZ ENTERTAINMENT, LLC et Case No. 2:23-cv-03097-ODW (MARx) al., 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT v. CRESCENDO CAPITAL S.A.’S CAM SPECIALTY LENDING 1, LTD et MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES 14 al., [51] Defendants. 16 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs Legendz Entertainment, LLC and Cinematic, LLC (collectively, 19 “Legendz” or “Plaintiffs”) filed this breach of contract action against Defendants 20 Crescendo Asset Management LLC (“CAM LLC”), CAM Specialty Lending 1, Ltd. 21 (“CAM Lending”), Brian Weiner (collectively, “CAM” or the “CAM Parties”), and 22 Crescendo Capital S.A. (“Crescendo”). (Second Am. Compl. (“SAC”) ¶¶ 5–10, ECF 23 No. 14.) The Court granted Crescendo’s motion to dismiss for lack of personal 24 jurisdiction. (Order Granting MTD 11, ECF No. 49.) Crescendo now seeks its 25 attorneys’ fees. (Mot. Att’y’s Fees Mem. (“Motion,” “Fee Motion,” or “Fee Mot.”) 1, 26 ECF No. 51.) …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.