Jina Lee v. Richman Property Services, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
O
JS-
2 3 4 5 6
United States District Court Central District of California
11 JINA LEE et al., Case № 2:24-cv-08286-ODW (SSCx)
Plaintiffs, ORDER REMANDING CASE AND
v. DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION
TO DISMISS [11]
14 RICHMAN PROPERTY SERVICES, INC. et al.,
Defendants.
17 I. INTRODUCTION On August 23, 2024, Plaintiffs Jina Lee and Jung Hwei Lee initiated this action 20 against Defendants Richman Property Services, Inc. (“Richman”) and DOES 1 21 through 10 for violation of California’s Investigative Consumer Reporting Agencies 22 Act (“ICRAA”) in the Superior Court of California. (Notice Removal (“NOR”) Ex. A 23 (“Complaint” or “Compl.”), ECF Nos. 1, 1-1.) On September 26, 2024, Richman 24 removed this action to federal court based on alleged diversity jurisdiction pursuant to 25 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a). (NOR ¶ 11.) On October 15, 2024, the Court ordered the parties 26 to show cause why this action should not be remanded for lack of subject-matter 27 jurisdiction. (Order Show Cause (“OSC”), ECF No 23.)…