Juan Francisco Molina v. W.L. Montgomery

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 21, 20245:21-cv-00570California516 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JUAN FRANCISCO MOLINA, Case No. 5:21-cv-00570-SB (MAA)

12 Petitioner,

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT

v.

AND RECOMMENDATION OF

JAMES HILL, Warden, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE 15 Respondent. 16 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the other records on file herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court also has reviewed Petitioner’s Statement of Objection to the Report and Recommendation, constructively filed on September 29, 2024, received by the Court on October 3, 2024, and docketed and served on Respondent on October 9, 2024 (Objections). (ECF No. 42.) As required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b)(3), the Court has engaged in de novo review of the portions of the Report and Recommendation to which Petitioner specifically has objected. The Objections lack merit for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation. In his Objections, Petitioner urges this Court to “dismiss the gun 28 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.