Giselle Hernandez v. Richman Property Services, Inc.

O

JS-

2 3 4 5 6

United States District Court Central District of California

11 GISELLE HERNANDEZ et al., Case № 2:24-cv-08242-ODW (SSCx)

Plaintiffs, ORDER REMANDING CASE AND

v. DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION

TO DISMISS [9]

14 RICHMAN PROPERTY SERVICES, INC. et al.,

Defendants.

17 I. INTRODUCTION On August 19, 2024, Plaintiffs Giselle Hernandez and Hilma Hernandez 20 initiated this action against Defendants Richman Property Services, Inc. (“Richman”) 21 and DOES through for violation of California’s Investigative Consumer 22 Reporting Agencies Act (“ICRAA”) in the Superior Court of California. (Notice 23 Removal (“NOR”) Ex. A (“Complaint” or “Compl.”), ECF Nos. 1, 1-1.) On 24 September 25, 2024, Richman removed this action to federal court based on alleged 25 diversity jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a). (NOR ¶ 11.) On October 22, 26 2024, the Court ordered the parties to show cause why this action should not be 27 remanded for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. …