Peterson

Peterson v. Thomson International, Incorporated

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 2, 20241:22-cv-00701California1,011 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MATTHEW PETERSON, et al., Case No. 1:22-cv-00701-JLT-CDB

Plaintiffs, ORDER RE: REQUEST FOR RESOLUTION

OF DISPUTED ISSUES

13 v. (Doc. 61)

THOMSON INT’L, INC.,

15 Defendant. 16 Pending before the Court is the “Joint Request for Court Resolution of the Disputed Issues” of Defendant Thomson International, Inc. and Plaintiff Carson Brenda. (Doc. 61). As set forth in the introductory paragraph of the joint filing, the parties’ request is made pursuant to Rules 30, 34 and 37, Fed. R. Civ. P. Plaintiff does not oppose the relief sough by Defendant. See id. p. 7 (“Plaintiff counsel filed a motion to withdraw as counsel for plaintiff Carson Brenda (Dkt. 60) and has no position other than what is stated in the motion.”). Accordingly, the Court construes the parties’ joint filing as an unopposed motion to compel. Background Plaintiffs are eight individuals from three different states and Canada that allege during June and July 2020, they…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.