Peterson
Peterson v. Thomson International, Incorporated
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MATTHEW PETERSON, et al., Case No. 1:22-cv-00701-JLT-CDB
Plaintiffs, ORDER RE: REQUEST FOR RESOLUTION
OF DISPUTED ISSUES
13 v. (Doc. 61)
THOMSON INT’L, INC.,
15 Defendant. 16 Pending before the Court is the “Joint Request for Court Resolution of the Disputed Issues” of Defendant Thomson International, Inc. and Plaintiff Carson Brenda. (Doc. 61). As set forth in the introductory paragraph of the joint filing, the parties’ request is made pursuant to Rules 30, 34 and 37, Fed. R. Civ. P. Plaintiff does not oppose the relief sough by Defendant. See id. p. 7 (“Plaintiff counsel filed a motion to withdraw as counsel for plaintiff Carson Brenda (Dkt. 60) and has no position other than what is stated in the motion.”). Accordingly, the Court construes the parties’ joint filing as an unopposed motion to compel. Background Plaintiffs are eight individuals from three different states and Canada that allege during June and July 2020, they…