Matteson

(PC) Allen v. Matteson

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 24, 20242:23-cv-01405California1,820 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 COLUMBUS ALLEN, JR., No. 2:23-cv-01405-WBS-EFB (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER G. MATTESON, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought against multiple defendants employed by California State Prison, Solano (CSP-Solano). ECF No. 1. In addition to filing a complaint, he has filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. ECF Nos. 6 & 7. The court will grant the in forma pauperis application and screen the complaint. Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis Plaintiff’s application makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1) and (2). Accordingly, by separate order, the court directs the agency having custody of plaintiff to collect and forward the appropriate monthly payments for the filing fee as set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1) and (2). //// //// Screening Standards …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.