Tate
Tate v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHELBY TATE, an individual; 1:23-cv-01743-JLT-SKO
Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO CLOSE
THE CASE
vs. (Doc. 12) WAL-MART ASSOCIATES, INC., a Delaware Corporation; WALMART, INC., a Delaware Corporation; ANGELICA BAEZA, an individual; and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive.
Defendants.
18 On May 22, 2024, the parties filed a joint stipulation dismissing the action with prejudice. (Doc. 12). In light of the parties’ stipulation, this action has been terminated, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. 23
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25 Dated: May 23, 2024 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto . 26
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
27 28