Vasquez

(PC) Valera v. Vasquez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 24, 20242:23-cv-00191California511 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOEL VALERA, No. 2:23-cv-00191-DAD-EFB (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER B. VASQUEZ, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has filed a motion for an order compelling defendant Vasquez to provide certain categories of evidence. ECF No. 28. He has also filed a motion for 90 additional days to reply to “any current procedure in this case that requires a response.” ECF No. 29. For the reasons that follow, the motions are denied. The Motion to Compel. Plaintiff asks the court to compel defendant to provide plaintiff with evidence spanning the past five years concerning certain misconduct claims against defendant and investigations by CDCR into such claims. However, plaintiff does not identify any discovery request issued to defendant seeking this information or argue that he served these requests on defendant and defendant failed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.