Mills
Mills v. Wal-Mart Associates,Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CAROLLYNE GALANSKI, Case No. 1:23-cv-01270-JLT-CDB
Plaintiff, ORDER RE: DISCOVERY DISPUTES
v. (Docs. 34-35)
WAL-MART ASSOCIATES, INC.,
Defendant. 16 ROBERT J. MILLS, Case No. 1:23-cv-01273-JLT-CDB 17 Plaintiff, ORDER RE: DISCOVERY DISPUTES 18 v. (Docs. 39-40)
WAL-MART ASSOCIATES, INC.,
20 Defendant. 21 22 Currently before the Court are numerous discovery disputes that the parties have agreed to submit to the Court for adjudication through the Court’s informal discovery dispute procedure. Background In these two related cases sharing a common discovery and pretrial motion schedule, Plaintiffs Robert J. Mills and Carollyne Galanski assert claims against Defendant Wal-Mart recover penalties under the Private Attorneys General Act (“PAGA”), Cal. Lab. Code §§ 2698 - 2699, for the alleged labor law violations. While Plaintiff Mills still was employed with Defendant as of the…