Calamco

Calamco v. J.R. Simplot Co.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 28, 20242:21-cv-01201California2,265 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CALAMCO, Case No. 2:21-cv-01201-KJM-CSK Plaintiff and DISCOVERY ORDER RE: Counterclaim Defendant, SIMPLOT’S REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION v. (ECF No. 111)

J.R. SIMPLOT COMPANY,

15 Defendant and Counterclaimant. 17 An informal telephonic discovery conference was held on May 21, 2024 at 18 9:00 a.m. regarding Defendant-Counterclaimant J.R. Simplot Company’s Requests for Production (RFP) Numbers 6, 10, 46, and 47 to Plaintiff-Counterclaim Defendant Calamco. 5/14/2024 Joint Letter re Discovery Dispute (ECF No. 111).1 Simplot seeks to 22 compel Calamco to produce two legal memoranda in response to Simplot’s RFP Nos. 6, 23 10, 46, and 47. Jonathan Eldredge appeared on behalf of Calamco, and Shane Smith 24 appeared on behalf of Simplot. After the discovery conference, the Court ordered 25 Calamco to address whether the two legal memoranda at issue in the discovery dispute 26 27 This matter proceeds…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.