Jiminez

(PC) Taylor v. Jiminez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 29, 20241:19-cv-00068California378 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHAUNTAE TAYLOR, Case No. 1:19-cv-00068-JLT-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO STAY

CASE PROCEEDINGS

v. (ECF No. 85) JIMINEZ, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Shauntae Taylor (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s first amended complaint against Defendants Jimenez, Rodriguez, Huckleberry, Rye, and Hernandez for deliberate indifference in violation of the Eighth Amendment. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s May 24, 2024 motion to stay case proceedings pending the Circuit Court’s Ruling on Plaintiff’s motion to the Ninth Circuit filed May 20, 2024. (ECF No. 85.) Defendants have not yet had the opportunity to file a response, but the Court finds a response unnecessary. The motion is deemed submitted. Local Rule 230(l). The district court “has broad discretion to stay proceedings as an incident…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.