Beyard

Beyard v. Pentagon Federal Credit Union

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 28, 20241:21-cv-01063California1,104 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 PANGNHIA VUE, Case No. 1:21-cv-01063-JLT-SAB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE APPLICATION TO AMEND v. SCHEDULING ORDER WITHOUT PREJUDICE

PENTAGON FEDERAL CREDIT UNION,

(ECF No. 46) Defendant. 16 The scheduling order issued in this matter on December 12, 2023, setting among other deadlines, the deadline to amend the pleadings as May 31, 2024. (ECF No. 43.) Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s ex parte application for modification of the deadline to amend the pleadings, filed on May 24, 2024. (ECF No. 46.) Plaintiff cites Local Rule 144 for its provisions regarding ex parte extensions. Plaintiff requests a sixty-day extension of the deadline to amend the pleadings to allow additional time to locate and add a potential class representative to the complaint. (ECF No. 46 at 2.) Plaintiff proffers that Defendant refuses to stipulate to the extension. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.