USPS

(PS) James v. USPS

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 29, 20242:24-cv-00880California493 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LATACHIANNA JAMES, Case No. 2:24-cv-00880-DAD-JDP (PS) Plaintiff, ORDER v. VACATING THE JUNE 13, 2024 HEARING UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, et FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS al., THAT THIS ACTION BE DISMISSED FOR Defendants. LACK OF PROSECUTION, FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH COURT ORDERS, AND

FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH LOCAL

RULES OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

DAYS

19 20 Defendant U.S. Postal Service filed a motion to dismiss, which is currently set for hearing 21 on June 13, 2024. ECF Nos. 5 & 11. After plaintiff failed to timely respond to that motion, I 22 continued the hearing on defendant’s motion and ordered plaintiff to show cause why sanctions 23 should not be imposed for her failure to comply with the court’s local rules. ECF No. 9. I also 24 ordered plaintiff file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.