Elliott

Elliott v. Conagra Brands, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 29, 20242:23-cv-01417California579 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LILLIAN ELLIOT, No. 2:23-cv-01417 MCE AC Plaintiff, v. PROTECTIVE ORDER CONAGRA BRANDS, INC., Defendant. 16 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties’ Stipulated Protective Order (ECF No. 37), is APPROVED and INCORPORATED herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT: 1. Requests to seal documents shall be made by motion before the same judge who will decide the matter related to that request to seal. 2. The designation of documents (including transcripts of testimony) as confidential pursuant to this order does not automatically entitle the parties to file such a document with the court under seal. Parties are advised that any request to seal documents in this district is governed by E.D. Cal. R. (“Local Rule”) 141. In brief, Local Rule 141 provides that documents may only be sealed by a written order of the court after a specific request to seal has been made. Local Rule 141(a). However, a mere request to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.