Miller v. Bank of America, N.A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHARLES MILLER, Case No. 1:21-cv-00337-SKO

Plaintiff,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE

v. CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED

FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH A

COURT ORDER TO JOIN A

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., NECESSARY PARTY UNDER RULE

13 Defendant. (Doc. 46) _____________________________________/

FOURTEEN DAY DEADLINE

15 On January 27, 2021, Plaintiff Charles Miller (“Plaintiff”) commenced this action against 16 Defendant Bank of America, N.A. (“BANA”) in Fresno County Superior Court. (See Doc. 1-1 at 17 4–11.) BANA removed the action to this Court on the basis of diversity jurisdiction on March 5, 18 2021. (See generally Doc. 1.) BANA then filed a motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of 19 the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Doc. 5.) 20 After granting BANA’s motion to dismiss on August 26, 2022, Plaintiff was given leave to 21 file an amended complaint. (See Doc. 24.) The First Amended Complaint, filed October 14, 2022, 22 alleges claims against BANA…