(PS) Wilkinson v. PHH Mortgage Corp.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 29, 20242:24-cv-01416California2,055 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KENNETH G. WILKINSON and KELLY No. 2:24-cv-01416 TLN AC (PS)

G. WILKINSON,

12 Plaintiffs, ORDER v. 14 PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION and WESTERN PROGRESSIVE LLC, Defendants. 17 Plaintiffs are proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was accordingly referred to the undersigned by E.D. Cal. 302(c)(21). Plaintiffs have filed a request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) and have submitted the affidavit required by that statute. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). The motion to proceed IFP will therefore be granted. I. Screening A. Legal Standard The federal IFP statute requires federal courts to dismiss a case if the action is legally “frivolous or malicious,” fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted or seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Plaintiff must assist the court in determining whether the complaint is frivolous, by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.