(PC) Mundy v. City and County of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 29, 20242:23-cv-00059California2,425 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STANLEY W. MUNDY, No. 2:23-cv-00059-CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER FINDING SERVICE OF

COMPLAINT APPROPRIATE FOR

CITY AND COUNTY OF CERTAIN DEFENDANTS AND FINDINGS SACRAMENTO, et al., AND RECOMMENDATIONS 15 Defendants.

17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). I. Screening Requirement On August 16, 2023, plaintiff submitted an amended complaint that is now before the court for screening. As plaintiff was previously advised, the court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner has raised claims that are legally “frivolous or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.