Ter-Galstanyan

Ter-Galstanyan v. County of Kern

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 29, 20241:22-cv-00645California1,170 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NORIK TER-GALSTANYAN, INGO Case No. 1:22-cv-00645-JLT-CDB

GONZALEZ, ALEXIS PULE,

ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITH Plaintiffs, PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO RULE 41(b) 13 v. (Docs. 5, 25)

COUNTY OF KERN, KERN COUNTY

SHERIFF’S OFFICE, KERN COUNTY

DISTRICT ATTORNEY’S OFFICE,

VIDAL CONTRERAS, COURTNEY LEWIS, and DOES 1 to 10, inclusive, 17 Defendants.

19 On May 3, 2024, the Court issued an order granting Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, (Doc. 20 9), and granting Plaintiffs leave to amend their malicious prosecution, Monell liability, and Sixth 21 Amendment claims. (Doc. 25 at 16–18.) The Court ordered: “Within 21 days, Plaintiffs may file 22 an amended complaint or a notice of dismissal. Failure to timely file either document will result 23 in dismissal of their case with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b).[]” (Doc. 25 at 16 (emphases in 24 original) (footnote omitted) (citing Edwards v. Marin Park, Inc., 356 F.3d 1058, 1063–65 (9th 25 Cir. 2004)).) More than twenty-one days…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.