Sanchez

Sanchez v. United States Bureau of Land Management

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 29, 20241:23-cv-01698California2,313 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ----oo0oo---- 11 VICTOR SANCHEZ and ANGELINA No. 1:23-cv-01698 WBS SAB SANCHEZ, individually and as Husband and Wife, UBALDO SANCHEZ, an individual and doing business as Strathmore Ag ORDER RE: MOTIONS TO DISMISS Supply, 15 Plaintiffs, 16 v. 17 FRIANT WATER AUTHORITY, a public agency of the State of California, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF RECLAMATION, an agency of the United States of America, and TULARE COUNTY, a county of California, 21 Defendants.

23 ----oo0oo---- 24 Plaintiffs Victor Sanchez, Angelina Sanchez, and Ubaldo 25 Sanchez bring this action asserting trespass to land (Claim 1), 26 injunctive relief (Claim 2), negligence (Claim 4), and 27 unreasonable diversion of surface water (Claim 5) against 28 defendants Friant Water Authority (“Friant”), United States Bureau of Reclamation (the “Bureau”), and Tulare County. (Compl. (Docket No. 1).) Plaintiffs also bring an inverse condemnation claim (Claim 3) against Friant and the County. (Id.) Friant and the Bureau now move…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.