Dayson

(PC) Fratus v. Dayson

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 28, 20242:20-cv-00354California2,045 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOHN FRATUS, No. 2:20-cv-0354 TLN DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER DAYSON, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff alleges that he suffered side effects from psychiatric medication and was denied medical treatment. Plaintiff has filed the instant motion to compel seeking production of portions of his medical records from August 21, 2016, that he requested from defendants, and seeking sanctions against defense counsel. (ECF No. 108.) For the reasons set forth below, the court will deny the motion to compel and for sanctions without prejudice. I. Motion to Compel and for Sanctions A. Plaintiff’s Motion Plaintiff seeks to compel defendant Dayson to produce portions of plaintiff’s medical records from August 16, 2021, in response to two requests for production. In August 2021, 28 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.