(HC) Bozeman v. Sacramento Superior Court

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 30, 20242:24-cv-00163California287 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ERIC ALLEN BOZEMAN, No. 2:24-cv-00163-DB Petitioner, v. ORDER & FINDINGS &

RECOMMENDATIONS

SACRAMENTO SUPERIOR COURT, Respondent. 16 By order filed April 25, 2024, petitioner was ordered to file a motion for in forma pauperis affidavit or pay the required filing fee within thirty days. (ECF No. 4.) Thirty days from that date have now passed, and petitioner has not filed an IFP, or otherwise responded to the court’s order. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to assign this action to a United States District Judge. IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.