Mroczek

(PS) Espinoza v. Mroczek

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 30, 20242:23-cv-00228California453 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAMON L. ESPINOZA, Case No. 2:23-cv-00228-TLN-JDP (PS) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v. THAT THE ACTION BE DISMISSED FOR

FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM

RICK MROCZEK, et al.,

OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

Defendants. DAYS 16 On January 17, 2024, I recommended that defendants’ motion to dismiss be granted and plaintiff’s first amended complaint be dismissed with leave to amend. ECF No. 21. On February 20, 2024, the court adopted the findings and recommendations, dismissed the amended complaint for failure to state a claim, and granted plaintiff thirty days to file a second amended complaint. ECF No. 22. Plaintiff failed to timely file an amended complaint. Accordingly, on April 30, 2024, I ordered him to show cause within fourteen days why this action should not be dismissed. ECF No. 23. I notified him that if he wished to continue with this lawsuit, he must file an amended complaint. I also warned…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.