(PC) Erakat v. Department of Treasury Internal Revenue Service

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 30, 20241:24-cv-00350California435 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AHMAD ERAKAT, No. 1:24-cv-00350-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION

SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED

v. (ECF No. 3) DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the instant action on March 25, 2024. On April 2, 2024, the Court ordered Plaintiff to submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the $405.00 filing fee within forty-five days. (ECF No. 3.) Plaintiff has failed to comply with the Court’s order and the time to do so has passed. In order to proceed with a civil action, plaintiff is required to either pay the filing fee or be granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a), 1915(a); see also Rodriguez v. Cook, 169 F.3d 1176, 1177 (9th Cir. 1999). Plaintiff has not paid the filing fee or sought leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this action. By order dated April…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.