Sacramento Homeless Union v. City of Sacramento
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SACRAMENTO HOMELESS UNION, et No. 2:22-cv-1095-TLN-KJN al., 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER v. 14 COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., 15 Defendants.
17 This matter is before the Court on Defendant City of Sacramento’s (the “City”) Motion for Partial Judgment on the Pleadings. (ECF No. 76.) Plaintiffs Sacramento Homeless Union, Betty Rios, Donta Williams, and Falisha Scott (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) filed an opposition. (ECF No. 77.) The City filed a reply. (ECF No. 79.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS the City’s motion. /// /// /// ///
Defendant County of Sacramento (the “County”) did not join in this motion. I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND A full recitation of the factual background of this case is not necessary as the facts are set forth fully in the Court’s prior order. (ECF No. 22.) In short, this case arises from the City and County’s alleged failure to protect the unhoused during Sacramento’s triple-digit heat…