Unknown

(PC) Howard v. Unknown

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 30, 20242:23-cv-01033California831 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EARLE S. HOWARD, No. 2:23-cv-1033 DB P Plaintiff,

v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE UNKNOWN, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Before the court are plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and plaintiff’s first amended complaint for screening. Plaintiff states in his complaint that he has not exhausted his administrative remedies before filing this action. Accordingly, this court must recommend dismissal of the complaint unless plaintiff can show he should be excused from exhaustion. Plaintiff will be given an opportunity to make that showing. SCREENING The court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or an officer or employee of a governmental entity. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner has…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.