Beck

(PC) Hayes v. Beck

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 30, 20242:23-cv-02694California1,250 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LAWRENCE P. HAYES, No. 2:23-cv-02694-EFB (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

CHRISTOPHER BECK, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a county jail inmate proceeding without counsel in an action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, has filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF No. 8.1 Additionally, the complaint is before the court for screening. I. Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis Plaintiff’s application makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1) and (2). Accordingly, by separate order, the court directs the agency having custody of plaintiff to collect and forward the appropriate monthly payments for the filing fee as set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1) and (2). //// //// 27 1 This proceeding was referred to a magistrate judge by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). II. Screening Requirement and Standards Federal courts must engage in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.