Munoz
Munoz v. Texas Roadhouse of Bakersfield, LLC
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAMON MUNOZ, Case No. 1:24-cv-00618-CDB Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO
SHOW CAUSE RE SUPPLEMENTAL
v. JURISDICTION TEXAS ROADHOUSE OF 14-Day Deadline BAKERSFIELD, LLC, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 On May 24, 2024, Plaintiff Ramon Munoz initiated this action against Defendants Texas Roadhouse of Bakersfield, LLC, and GS Portfolio Holdings, LLC. (Doc. 1.) In his complaint, Plaintiff asserts claims for injunctive relief and attorneys’ fees under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (“ADA”), and a claim for statutory damages and attorneys’ fees under California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act (“Unruh Act”), California Civil Code §§ 51-53. (Id.). Based upon the recent Ninth Circuit opinion in Vo v. Choi, this Court will order Plaintiff to show cause why the Court should not decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff’s Unruh Act claim. See 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c); Vo v. Choi, 49 F.4th 1167 (9th…