(PS) Lax v. Abode Services

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 30, 20242:22-cv-00769California440 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CRYSTAL LAX, et al., Case No. 2:22-cv-00769-DJC-JDP (PS) Plaintiffs, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v. THAT THE ACTION BE DISMISSED FOR

FAILURE TO PROSECUTE, FAILURE TO

ADOBE SERVICES, et al., STATE A CLAIM, AND FAILURE TO

COMPLY WITH COURT ORDERS

Defendants.

OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

DAYS 17 On March 11, 2024, I screened plaintiffs’ complaint, notified them that it failed to state a claim, and granted them thirty days to file an amended complaint. ECF No. 7. Plaintiffs failed to timely file an amended complaint. Accordingly, on April 30, 2024, I ordered them to show cause within fourteen days why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to state a claim. ECF No. 8. I notified plaintiffs that if they wished to continue with this lawsuit, they must file an amended complaint. I also warned plaintiffs that failure to comply with the April…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.