Kelso

(PC) Puckett v. Kelso

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 31, 20241:23-cv-00054California802 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DURRELL ANTHONY PUCKETT, Case No. 1:23-cv-00054-KES-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF

v. (Doc. No. 86) J. BARRIOS, et al.,

Defendants. 16 On April 15, 2024, Plaintiff Durrell Anthony Puckett filed a Motion for Summary Judgment on his Eighth Amendment conditions of confinement and Fourteenth Amendment equal protection claims. (Doc. No. 82, “MSJ”). On May 1, 2024, Defendants filed a Motion to Stay Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment and Extend the Time to File an Exhaustion-Based Motion for Summary Judgment. (Doc. No. 86, “Motion”). Defendant asks the Court to stay all deadlines on Plaintiff’s MSJ because Defendants have only recently appeared in this action, more than five months remain in discovery, and Defendants have had no meaningful opportunity to conduct discovery including deposing Plaintiff. (See generally id.). Defendants also request the Court extend the deadline for filing an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.