Frye

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SHARRON FRYE, Case No. 2:22-cv-1936-DJC-CSK Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MODIFIED

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

V. (ECF No. 31.) CITY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants.

The Court has reviewed the parties’ stipulated protective order below (ECF No. 31), and finds it comports with the relevant authorities and the Court’s Local Rule. See L.R. 141.1. The Court APPROVES the protective order, subject to the following clarification. The Court’s Local Rules indicate that once an action is closed, it “will not retain jurisdiction over enforcement of the terms of any protective order filed in that action.” L.R. 141.1(f); see MD Helicopters, Inc. v. Aerometals, |Inc., 2017 WL 495778 (E.D. Cal., Feb. 03, 2017) (noting that courts in the district generally do not retain jurisdiction for disputes concerning protective orders after closure of the case). Thus, the Court will not retain jurisdiction over this protective order once the case is closed. Dated: May 30, 2024 yy

CHI SOO KIM

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

3, frye.1936

Jason O. Balogh (CSB #…