Blizzard

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAGHVENDRA SINGH, No. 2:23-cv-0024 KJM DB PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER THADD A. BLIZZARD, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Raghvendra Singh is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Pending before the court are plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, amended complaint, motion to appoint counsel, and motion to stay these proceedings. (ECF Nos. 2, 6, 7.) The amended complaint alleges that the defendants “sold Singh’s properties without informing Singh.” (Am. Compl. (ECF No. 6) at 1.) The court is required to screen complaints brought by parties proceeding in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2); see also Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1129 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc). Here, plaintiff’s amended complaint is deficient. Accordingly, the amended complaint will be dismissed…