Abdulgader

(PC) Wolinski v. Abdulgader

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 3, 20242:21-cv-02078California1,504 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KRZYSZTOF F. WOLINSKI, No. 2:21-cv-02078-DJC-CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER ABDULBASET ABDULGADER, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently pending before the court are defendants’ motion to compel discovery responses and plaintiff’s motion for a court order. ECF Nos. 57, 60. For the reasons discussed below, the court will grant defendants’ motion to compel and deny plaintiff’s motion for a court order. I. Procedural History This case is proceeding on a First Amendment retaliation claim against defendant Abdulgader as well as an Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference claim against defendants Abdulgader and Williams as alleged in plaintiff’s first amended complaint. See ECF Nos. 28 (Findings and Recommendations), 34 (order adopting Findings and Recommendations). A Discovery and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.