Yamaguina

(PC) Watts v. Yamaguina

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 3, 20242:23-cv-01243California744 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 VERNELL WATTS, No. 2:23-cv-1243 TLN CSK P Plaintiff, v. ORDER A. YAMAGIWA, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis. Plaintiff seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On April 29, 2024, the Court recommended that this action be dismissed based on plaintiff’s failure to comply with a court order, and failure to keep the Court apprised of plaintiff’s current address. However, the Court did not address the factors required before recommending dismissal for failure to prosecute or to comply with a Court order. Pagtalunan v. Galaza, 291 F.3d 639, 642 (9th Cir. 2002). Therefore, the April 29, 2024 findings and recommendations are vacated. (ECF No. 10.) As discussed below, plaintiff is granted fourteen days to file a change of address and is cautioned that failure to do so will result in the dismissal of this action. Standards Local Rule 110 provides…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.