Kitt

(PC) Ramirez v. Kitt

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 4, 20241:17-cv-00947California1,862 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ARMANDO RAMIREZ, Case No. 1:17-cv-00947-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR APPOINTMENT OF EXPERT

v. WITNESSES (ECF No. 65) KITT,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

Defendant. FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL,

WITHOUT PREJUDICE

(ECF No. 66)

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR ARBITRATION OR MEDIATION,

WITHOUT PREJUDICE (ECF No. 66) 19 Plaintiff Armando Ramirez (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s first amended complaint against Defendant Kitt (“Defendant”) for deliberate indifference to serious medical needs in violation of the Eighth Amendment. All parties have consented to United States Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (ECF Nos. 40, 43.) Following resolution of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.