Kitt
(PC) Ramirez v. Kitt
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ARMANDO RAMIREZ, Case No. 1:17-cv-00947-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
FOR APPOINTMENT OF EXPERT
v. WITNESSES (ECF No. 65) KITT,
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
Defendant. FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL,
WITHOUT PREJUDICE
(ECF No. 66)
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
FOR ARBITRATION OR MEDIATION,
WITHOUT PREJUDICE (ECF No. 66) 19 Plaintiff Armando Ramirez (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s first amended complaint against Defendant Kitt (“Defendant”) for deliberate indifference to serious medical needs in violation of the Eighth Amendment. All parties have consented to United States Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (ECF Nos. 40, 43.) Following resolution of…