Fazio

(PC) Flores v. Fazio

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 4, 20241:23-cv-00928California1,271 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 ALEXANDER FLORES, 1:23-cv-00928-EPG (PC) 10 Plaintiff, ORDER TO ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE 11 v. AND

J. FAZIO,

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO Defendant. DISMISS THIS ACTION WITHOUT

PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO

PROSECUTE AND FAILURE TO COMPLY

WITH COURT’S ORDERS

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

DAYS

Plaintiff Alexander Flores is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action filed pursuant 19 to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. For reasons stated below, the Court recommends that this case be 20 dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. I. BACKGROUND 22 This action was initiated by civil complaint filed by Plaintiff in the Superior Court of 23 California, County of Kern, on April 4, 2023, Case No. BCV-23-101028. (ECF No.1–2). 24 Plaintiff alleges a claim related to conditions of his confinement. (Id. at 4). Defendant removed 25 the case to this Court on June 21, 2023 (ECF No. 1) and requested the Court to screen the 26 complaint under 28 U.S.C. §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.