(PC)Favor

(PC)Favor v. Villegas

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 5, 20241:24-cv-00610California1,322 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRANDON FAVOR, Case No.: 1:24-cv-00610-SKO Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DENY PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION TO

v. PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

S. VILLEGAS, et al., (Doc. 2)

Defendants. 14-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD

Clerk of the Court to Assign District Judge

17 Plaintiff Brandon Favor is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On May 22, 2024, Plaintiff filed an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”). (Doc. 2.) Plaintiff’s application to proceed IFP should be denied for two reasons: (1) Plaintiff sets forth substantial income and assets in his IFP application; and (2) he is not entitled to proceed without prepayment of fees because he has accrued three or more “strikes” under section 28 U.S.C. § 1915 and does not qualify for the imminent danger exception. I. PLAINTIFF’S INCOME AND ASSETS ARE SIGNIFICANT …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.