Riaz

Riaz v. Henry

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 4, 20241:21-cv-00911California2,662 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAMREEN RIAZ, Case No. 1:21-cv-00911-KES-SKO 11 Plaintiff, ORDER VACATING HEARING AND DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO v. STAY 13 NATHAN HENRY, et al., (Docs. 37 & 40) 14 Defendants. _____________________________________/

I. INTRODUCTION This matter is before the Court on Defendants City of Visalia, Nathan Henry, Edvin Canto, and Art Alvarez (collectively, “City Defendants”)’s “Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Resolution of Related Case on Appeal,” filed May 1, 2024 (the “Motion”). (Doc. 37.) Defendants County of Tulare and Ernest Ceballos (together, “County Defendants”) filed a joinder in the Motion

1 City Defendants also filed a Request for Judicial Notice in support of the Motion (“Request for Judicial Notice”). (Doc. 39.) Plaintiff has not filed an opposition. (See Docket.) Grants of judicial notice are a matter of judicial discretion. See United States v. Nat. Med. Enters., Inc., 792…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.