Riaz
Riaz v. Henry
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 4, 20241:21-cv-00911California2,662 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAMREEN RIAZ, Case No. 1:21-cv-00911-KES-SKO 11 Plaintiff, ORDER VACATING HEARING AND DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO v. STAY 13 NATHAN HENRY, et al., (Docs. 37 & 40) 14 Defendants. _____________________________________/
I. INTRODUCTION This matter is before the Court on Defendants City of Visalia, Nathan Henry, Edvin Canto, and Art Alvarez (collectively, “City Defendants”)’s “Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Resolution of Related Case on Appeal,” filed May 1, 2024 (the “Motion”). (Doc. 37.) Defendants County of Tulare and Ernest Ceballos (together, “County Defendants”) filed a joinder in the Motion
1 City Defendants also filed a Request for Judicial Notice in support of the Motion (“Request for Judicial Notice”). (Doc. 39.) Plaintiff has not filed an opposition. (See Docket.) Grants of judicial notice are a matter of judicial discretion. See United States v. Nat. Med. Enters., Inc., 792…